Computing is the UK's most authoritative voice on business technology issues. Do you agree with the views of our readers from the newspaper's letters page? Computing is the UK's most authoritative voice on business technology issues. Do you agree with the views of our readers from the newspaper's letters page? Computing is the UK's most authoritative voice on business technology issues. Do you agree with the views of our readers from the newspaper's letters page?

« Can’t buy me honesty | Main | Industrial strength »

Wednesday, 27 February 2008

Ticking boxes

This is a very good article (Lite relief for project delivery), but I believe that the author’s statement: “The fact that a project is well-managed and ticks the right boxes does not mean it will deliver a working system” is incorrect.

I think a project is well-managed when the scope verification is being done properly – and in absence of such verification nobody can guarantee a “working system”. The point to note is the definition of a “working system”. In my view, it is a system that conforms to the requirements of the work. In fact, this is what quality management is all about. If we do not do this, the project cannot be said to be well-managed.

Tanuj Mittal

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/1105496/26575168

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ticking boxes:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In


Contacts

Powered by TypePad
© 1995-2006 All rights reserved