As a network manager in a school environment I find the biggest problem I come across is the support staff put "in my way" as part of BSF (Vice-like grip, letters.computing.co.uk).

For example, I had a hardware failure on the internet connection which I diagnosed, but I have to report to the company put in place under the BSF agreement. Twenty minutes later I get a phone call from a field engineer who goes through some diagnostics which I had already tried, which is then referred to the corporate IT department of our council.

Twenty minutes after the call from the engineer I get a call from the council's IT  department, which diagnoses a failure on the fibre converter which needs to be swapped out. The response I get is I have to contact the support company who deals with schools, who will then  contact the same person I have just spoken to, to arrange replacement parts to be sent out to them, then they will come out and change the failed item.

In the old system in the days before BSF, all I had to do was make one phone call and diagnose the issue.
Once this was done an agreement was made on when and where the hardware item was replaced. Nine times out of 10, I met the engineer halfway between his base and mine and exchanged the parts.
Most fixes were sorted within the hour. This incident was still going 12 hours after the fault was reported. By saying the likes of   in-house support staff stand in the way of education is a joke.

We know more of what is going on and work harder than most to deliver a system which meets the needs of pupils and staff and is as cutting edge as is possible to the tight budgets we are given.

Simon Dart